Comparison of Surgical and Non-Surgical Approaches for Class III Malocclusion Correction in Adults: A Literature Review

Jenniffer Cristina Castillo  Cisneros; Bryan Santiago Llumiquinga Ñacata; Valeria Estefanía Tapia Corrales; Erika de las Mercedes Molina  Mogrovejo; Nathali Esthefania Muzo Yépez; Francisco Xavier Llanganate  Onofa

doi:10.55640/ijmsdh-10-08-01

Open Access

Comparison of Surgical and Non-Surgical Approaches for Class III Malocclusion Correction in Adults: A Literature Review

Vol. 10 No. 08 (2024): Volume 10 Issue 08 | Pages: 01-11 | https://doi.org/10.55640/ijmsdh-10-08-01

Authors

Jenniffer Cristina Castillo Cisneros
Dentist, Ministerio de Salud Pública, Ecuador
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0322-5216

Bryan Santiago Llumiquinga Ñacata
Dentist, Diploma in Occlusion and Temporomandibular Disorders, Master's Degree in Health Institution Management / Independent Investigator, Ecuador.
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6913-9578

Valeria Estefanía Tapia Corrales
Dentist, Diploma in Dental Implants./ Independent Investigator, Ecuador.
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5890-8998

Erika de las Mercedes Molina Mogrovejo
Dentist, Postgraduate in Operative and Dental Aesthetics / Ministerio de Salud Pública, Ecuador.
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0298-3203

Nathali Esthefania Muzo Yépez
Dentist, Independent Investigator, Ecuador.
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0330-2014

Francisco Xavier Llanganate Onofa
Dentist, Ministerio de Salud Pública, Ecuador.
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9549-7529

Views: 328 Downloads: 386
Google Scholar

Published Date: 2024-08-03
Download PDF: pdf

Copyright License

Copyright (c) 2024 Jenniffer Cristina Castillo Cisneros, Bryan Santiago Llumiquinga Ñacata, Valeria Estefanía Tapia Corrales, Erika de las Mercedes Molina Mogrovejo, Nathali Esthefania Muzo Yépez, Francisco Xavier Llanganate Onofa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the rights to their work published in the International Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health and may republish or reproduce their own work, provided proper citation to the original publication in IJMSDH is included.

How to Cite

Cisneros, J. C. C. ., Ñacata, B. S. L., Corrales, V. E. T., Mogrovejo, E. de las M. M. ., Yépez, N. E. M., & Onofa, F. X. L. . (2024). Comparison of Surgical and Non-Surgical Approaches for Class III Malocclusion Correction in Adults: A Literature Review. International Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health, 10(08), 01-11. https://doi.org/10.55640/ijmsdh-10-08-01

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

Because malocclusion involves complex facial abnormalities, orthodontic treatment may be rather challenging, especially for Class III malocclusion. In order to treat adult Class III malocclusion, this narrative review assesses and contrasts the effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical methods. With an emphasis on current developments over the last ten years, the study methodically obtained and examined literature from reliable databases. The results show that orthodontic camouflage, protraction facemask, and chin cup therapy are excellent non-surgical therapies for mild to moderate malocclusions, frequently avoiding the need for surgery. Although helpful for young patients, chin cup treatment could not endure if it is stopped before the patient reaches full maturity. With notable improvements in overjet and facial aesthetics, protraction facemask treatment has promise in lessening the need for orthognathic surgery. When a patient cannot afford or is uncomfortable with surgery, orthodontic camouflage is a good alternative. More effective and long-lasting repairs may be achieved for severe malocclusions by surgical procedures such orthognathic surgery, surgically aided rapid palatal expansion (SARPE), and microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE). These operations, however, come with more risk and need more time to recuperate from. The present study emphasises the significance of customised treatment planning in Class III malocclusion therapy. This planning should take into account the patient's age, preferences, and the severity of the malocclusion.

References

Y. F. H. G. B. L. Y. Z. L Guo, “Consequences of orthodontic treatment in malocclusion patients: clinical and microbial effects in adults and children,” BMC Oral Health, vol. 112, pp. 1–7, 2016.

M. S. Alhammadi, E. Halboub, M. S. Fayed, A. Labib, and C. El-Saaidi, “Global distribution of malocclusion traits: a systematic review,” Dent. Press J Orthod, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 40.e41-40.e10, 2018, doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.40.e1-10.onl.

P. M. Berto, C. S. Lima, M. A. Lenza, and J. Faber, “Esthetic effect of orthodontic appliances on a smiling face with and without a missing maxillary first premolar,” Am J Orthod Dentofac. Orthop, vol. 135, no. 4 SUPPL., pp. S55-60, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.018.

L. de Frutos-Valle, C. Martin, J. A. Alarcon, J. C. Palma-Fernandez, and A. Iglesias-Linares, “Subclustering in skeletal class III phenotypes of different ethnic origins: a systematic review,” J Evid Based Dent Pr., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 34–52, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2018.09.002.

A. Jamilian, R. Cannavale, M. G. Piancino, S. Eslami, and L. Perillo, “Methodological quality and outcome of systematic reviews reporting on orthopaedic treatment for class III malocclusion: Overview of systematic reviews,” J. Orthod., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 102–120, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1080/14653125.2016.1155334.

P. Ngan, B. Wilmes, D. Drescher, C. Martin, B. Weaver, and E. Gunel, “Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment,” Prog. Orthod., vol. 16, no. 1, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1186/S40510-015-0096-7.

L. Perillo, B. Femminella, D. Farronato, T. Baccetti, L. Contardo, and G. Perinetti, “Do malocclusion and Helkimo Index ≥5 correlate with body posture?,” J. Oral Rehabil., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 242–252, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2842.2010.02156.X.

L. Perillo, M. Vitale, C. Masucci, F. D’Apuzzo, P. Cozza, and L. Franchi, “Comparisons of two protocols for the early treatment of Class III dentoskeletal disharmony,” Eur. J. Orthod., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 51–56, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1093/EJO/CJV010.

L. Perillo, A. Monsurrò, E. Bonci, A. Torella, M. Mutarelli, and V. Nigro, “Genetic association of ARHGAP21 gene variant with mandibular prognathism,” J. Dent. Res., vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 569–576, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0022034515572190.

W. J. Kerr, S. Miller, and J. E. Dawber, “Class III malocclusion: surgery or orthodontics?,” Br. J. Orthod., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 21–24, 1992, doi: 10.1179/BJO.19.1.21.

A. Stellzig-Eisenhauer, C. J. Lux, and G. Schuster, “Treatment decision in adult patients with Class III malocclusion: Orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery?,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 27–37, 2002, doi: 10.1067/MOD.2002.123632.

A.-B. M. Rabie, R. W. K. Wong, and G. U. Min, “Treatment in Borderline Class III Malocclusion: Orthodontic Camouflage (Extraction) Versus Orthognathic Surgery,” Open Dent. J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 38–48, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.2174/1874210600802010038.

S. Mousoulea, I. Tsolakis, E. Ferdianakis, and A. I. Tsolakis, “The Effect of Chin-cup Therapy in Class III Malocclusion: A Systematic Review,” Open Dent. J., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 664, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.2174/1874210601610010664.

B. Wendl et al., “Long-term skeletal and dental effects of facemask versus chincup treatment in Class III patients: A retrospective study,” J. Orofac. Orthop., vol. 78, no. 4, p. 293, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1007/S00056-017-0083-3.

G. Gür and D. Erdem, “Early Treatment of a Class III Patient with Chincup: A Case Report,” Cumhur. Dent. J., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 104–110, 2023, doi: 10.7126/CUMUDJ.1213205.

S. Watkinson, J. E. Harrison, S. Furness, and H. V. Worthington, “Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children,” Cochrane database Syst. Rev., vol. 2013, no. 9, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003451.PUB2.

W. Liu, Y. Zhou, X. Wang, D. Liu, and S. Zhou, “Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: A single-center, randomized controlled trial,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 641–651, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.AJODO.2015.04.038.

W. Zhang, H. C. Qu, M. Yu, and Y. Zhang, “The effects of maxillary protraction with or without rapid maxillary expansion and age factors in treating Class III malocclusion: A meta-Analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 6, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0130096.

N. Mandall et al., “Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial,” J. Orthod., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 164–175, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1080/14653125.2016.1201302.

M. T. de S. Araujo and L. R. Squeff, “Orthodontic camouflage as a treatment alternative for skeletal Class III,” Dental Press J. Orthod., vol. 26, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.4.E21BBO4.

J. H. Park, M. Emamy, and S. H. Lee, “Adult skeletal Class III correction with camouflage orthodontic treatment,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., vol. 156, no. 6, pp. 858–869, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.AJODO.2018.07.029.

Y. G. J Lin, “Preliminary investigation of nonsurgical treatment of severe skeletal class III malocclusion in the permanent dentition,” Angle Orthod, vol. 73, pp. 401–410, 2003.

L. Rustico, V. Ronsivalle, F. Iaculli, G. Spagnuolo, G. Isola, and A. Lo Giudice, “Class III Orthodontic Camouflage: Is the ‘Ideal’ Treatment Always the Best Option? A Documented Case Report,” Case Rep. Dent., vol. 2022, no. 1, p. 9200469, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/9200469.

B. A. Furquim, K. M. S. De Freitas, G. Janson, L. F. Simoneti, M. R. De Freitas, and D. S. De Freitas, “Class III Malocclusion Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment,” Case Rep. Dent., vol. 2014, 2014, doi: 10.1155/2014/868390.

M. S. Alhammadi et al., “Orthodontic camouflage versus orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment in borderline class III malocclusion: a systematic review,” Clin. Oral Investig., vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 6443–6455, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S00784-022-04685-6/TABLES/5.

A. Rachmiel, S. Turgeman, D. Shilo, O. Emodi, and D. Aizenbud, “Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion to Correct Maxillary Transverse Deficiency,” Ann. Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 136, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.4103/AMS.AMS_163_19.

A. Anttila, K. Finne, K. Keski-Nisula, M. Somppi, K. Panula, and T. Peltomäki, “Feasibility and long-term stability of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with lateral osteotomy,” Eur. J. Orthod., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 391–395, 2004, doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.4.391.

A. Barrabé, C. Meyer, H. Bonomi, E. Weber, N. Sigaux, and A. Louvrier, “Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion in class III malocclusion: Our experience,” J. Stomatol. oral Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 384–388, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.JORMAS.2018.05.001.

A. Wilson Machado, “An interview with Won Moon. By André Wilson Machado, Barry Briss, Greg J Huang, Richard Kulbersh and Sergei Godeiro Fernandes Rabelo Caldas,” Dental Press J. Orthod., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 12–28, May 2013, doi: 10.1590/S2176-94512013000300005.

S. N. Shih, K. H. Ho, C. W. Wang, K. L. Wang, S. C. Hsieh, and H. M. Chang, “Management of Class III Malocclusion and Maxillary Transverse Deficiency with Microimplant-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE): A Case Report,” Med. 2022, Vol. 58, Page 1052, vol. 58, no. 8, p. 1052, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/MEDICINA58081052.