Expanding Horizons of CBCT in Prosthodontics: Diagnosis and Planning in Implant, Maxillofacial, TMJ, and Overdenture Therapies (A review)

Nusaiba Mustafa Muhammed; Duha Qais Sabah

doi:10.55640/ijmsdh-11-07-12

Open Access

Expanding Horizons of CBCT in Prosthodontics: Diagnosis and Planning in Implant, Maxillofacial, TMJ, and Overdenture Therapies (A review)

Vol. 11 No. 07 (2025): Volume 11 Issue 07 | Pages: 96-100 | https://doi.org/10.55640/ijmsdh-11-07-12

Authors

Nusaiba Mustafa Muhammed
Dentistry College/university of Tikrit , Iraq

Duha Qais Sabah
Dentistry College/Al Mashreq University, Iraq

Views: 12 Downloads: 21
Google Scholar

Published Date: 2025-07-26
Download PDF: pdf

Copyright License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the rights to their work published in the International Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health and may republish or reproduce their own work, provided proper citation to the original publication in IJMSDH is included.

How to Cite

Expanding Horizons of CBCT in Prosthodontics: Diagnosis and Planning in Implant, Maxillofacial, TMJ, and Overdenture Therapies (A review). (2025). International Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health, 11(07), 96-100. https://doi.org/10.55640/ijmsdh-11-07-12

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

Background: Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has revolutionized radiological examination. The use of CBCT in the orofacial area allows for precise three-dimensional visualization. The shortcomings of two-dimensional radiological technologies, particularly in terms of dental implants, motivate the widespread use of CBCT equipment. Aim: To highlight the benefits and limitations of employing CBCT equipment in various disciplines of prosthodontics for diagnosis and treatment planning of implant, maxilla-facial, temporomandibular joint, and overdenture therapy.

CBCT is currently widely utilized in many prosthodontic treatments. The key reasons are its smaller size, lower cost, and decreased radiation exposure when compared to computed tomography. CBCT allows for three-dimensional examination of the maxilla, mandible, skull, and other relevant structures. Conclusion: Three-dimensional radiography, or CBCT, is a diagnostic tool that dentists and dental specialists may utilize to conduct a complete examination and arrange treatments.

References

Zain-Alabdeen EH, Al-Ani O, Alsulaimani RS. The value of cone-beam computed tomography in evaluating temporomandibular joint disorders: A review. Saudi Dent J. 2020;32(2):49–57. doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.07.005

Joda T, Gallucci GO, Wismeijer D, Zitzmann NU. Augmented implant planning in the digital era: virtual surgical planning and guided surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2022;89(1):103–121. doi:10.1111/prd.12405

Abduo J, Lau D. Implant overdenture planning using CBCT with a bone-supported surgical guide: A case series. J Prosthodont Res. 2023;67(2):211–218. doi:10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2022_158

de-Azevedo-Vaz SL, Vasconcelos TV, Neves FS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT for detection of peri-implant bone defects: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(7):2445–2453. doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2382-8

Jha P, Patel R, Bhatt A. Applications of cone beam computed tomography in prosthodontics: A review. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2022;8(2):448–452.6-Taneja S, Barbee DL, Rea AJ, Malin M .CBCT image quality QA: Establishing a quantitative program. J Appl Clin Med Phys .2020 ;21: 215-225.

Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, Buser D. Hypothetical outcome of implant planning with panoramic radiography vs cone-beam CT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(6):e148–e157.

Stokes K, Thieme R, Jennings E, Sholapurkar A. Cone beam computed tomography in dentistry: practitioner awareness and attitudes. A scoping review. Aust Dent J. 2021 ;66(3):234-245.

Palomo JM, Kau CH, Palomo LB, Hans MG. Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in dentistry. Dent Today .2006;25(11):130, 132-5.

Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: New Tom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003. July;32(4):229–34.

Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006. July;35(4):219–26.

Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LL, Mol A. Dosimetry of recently introduced cbct units for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Beijing, China: Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. June 2007:97.

Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac March;33(2):83–6. Radiol. 2004.

Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U et al.. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011. July;40(5):265–73.

Endo M, Tsunoo T, Nakamori N, Yoshida K. Effect of scattered radiation on image noise in cone beam CT. Med Phys. 2001. April;28(4):469–74.

Farman AG. Guest editorial—Self-referral: an ethical concern with respect to multidimensional imaging in dentistry? J Appl Oral Sci. 2009. Sep Oct;17(5).

John G P, Joy TE ,Mathew J, Kumar VRB. Applications of cone beam computed tomography for a 180 Prosthodontics applications and Cone ….13(1) (2025) 176-181 prosthodontist. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society .2016; 16: 1-7.

Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(3 suppl 1):102-121.

Schulze RKW, Drage NA. Cone-beam computed tomography and its applications in dental and maxillofacial radiology. Clin Radiol. 2020 Sep;75(9):647-657.

Kurt Bayrakdar S, Orhan K, Bayrakdar IS, Bilgir E, Ezhov M, Gusarev M, Shumilov E. A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images. BMC Med Imaging. 2021 May 19;21(1):86

Jaju PP, Jaju SP. Clinical utility of dental cone beam computed tomography: current perspectives. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2014;6:29-43.

Tavelli L, Borgonovo AE, Re D, Maiorana C. Sinus presurgical evaluation: a literature review and a new classification proposal. Minerva Stomatol. 2017 Jun;66(3):115-131.

Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Peltola J. Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multi slice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol .2008;37(1):10-17.

Harris D., Horner K, Gröndahl K, Jacobs R, Helmrot E, Benic G.I., Bornstein M.M., Dawood A, Quirynen M. E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011.A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Res. 2012;23(11):1243-1253.

Worthington P, Rubenstein J, Hatcher DC. The role of cone-beam computed tomography in the planning and placement of implants. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010; 141 ( 3):19-24.

John GP, Joy TE, Justin Mathew J, Kumar VRB. Fundamentals of cone beam computed tomography for a prosthodontist.. J Indian Prosthodont Soc ,2015; 15(1): 8-13.

Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dento maxillofac Radiol. 1999:28(4): 245–248.

Sabane AV, Thareja A, Jadhav R. CBCT in Dentistry: A Literature View. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2014;6:100-105.

Chau AC, Fung K. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107(4):559–565

Lindh C, Obrant K, Petersson A. Maxillary bone mineral density and its relationship to the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and hip. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 98(1):102 109.

Singh A, Chandra S, Agarwal D.K, Bhattacharya P. A study to evaluate the alveolar bone thickness during anterior retraction using computed tomography. Int. J. Con Med Res .2017; 4(5):1021-1026.

Jawaid M, Amir A, Shahnawaz K, Qamar Y, Upadhay P, Singh J. Maxillofacial imaging in forensic science: a newer approach. Int J Con Med Res. 2016; 3(8):2491-2495.

Schneiderman E.D., Xu H., Salyer K.E. Characterization of the maxillary complex in unilateral cleft lip and palate using cone beam computed tomography: a preliminary study. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2009;20(2):1699–1710.

Albuquerque M.A., Gaia B.F., Cavalcanti M.G. Comparison between multislice and cone-beam computerized tomography in the volumetric assessment of cleft palate. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2011;112(2):249–257.

Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein M.M. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18: 88.