Zeolites as Natural Biomaterials in Conservative Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review

Abstract

Conservative dentistry focuses on preserving tooth structure through preventive and minimally invasive strategies. A persistent challenge is preventing bacterial colonization and secondary caries at restoration margins. Zeolites, naturally occurring microporous aluminosilicate minerals, have recently gained attention for their ion-exchange capabilities and ability to provide sustained antimicrobial activity. Their natural origin, abundance, and eco-friendly properties position them as attractive alternatives to synthetic antimicrobial additives. This review summarizes the natural origin, structural and chemical properties of zeolites, their mechanisms of antibacterial action, and their integration into restorative systems including glass ionomer cements, resin composites, adhesives, and mineral trioxide aggregate. Benefits, challenges, and future research directions are discussed, highlighting zeolites as promising natural biomaterials for the next generation of minimally invasive restorative dentistry.

Keywords:

Zeolites, Natural biomaterials, Conservative Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry, Antibacterial materials, Bioactive restoratives

References

Deshpande S, Kheur S, Kheur M, Eyüboğlu TF, Özcan M. A review on zeolites and their applications in dentistry. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2023; 10:36–42.

Mount GJ, Ngo H. Minimal intervention: a new concept for operative dentistry. Quintessence Int. 2000;31(8):527–33.

Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):29–38.

Beyth N, Yudovin-Farber I, Bahir R, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2006;27(21):3995–4002.

Li W, Qi M, Sun X, et al. Novel dental adhesive containing silver exchanged EMT zeolites against cariogenic biofilms. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020; 299:110113.

Casemiro LA, Martins CH, Pires-de-Souza FD, Panzeri H. Antimicrobial and mechanical properties of acrylic resins with incorporated silver–zinc zeolite. Gerodontology. 2008;25(3):187–94.

Odabaş ME, Çinar Ç, Akça G, et al. Short-term antimicrobial properties of mineral trioxide aggregate with incorporated silver-zeolite. Dent Traumatol. 2011;27(3):189–94.

Mumpton FA. La roca magica: Uses of natural zeolites in agriculture and industry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(7):3463–70.

Colella C. Natural zeolites in environmentally friendly processes and applications. Stud Surf Sci Catal. 2007; 168:999–1012.

Armbruster T, Gunter ME. Crystal structures of natural zeolites. Rev Mineral Geochem. 2001; 45:1–67.

Breck DW. Zeolite Molecular Sieves: Structure, Chemistry, and Use. New York: Wiley; 1974.

Flanigen EM, Khatami H, Szymanski HA. Infrared structural studies of zeolite frameworks. Adv Chem Ser. 1971; 101:201–29.

Hao J, Lang S, Mante F, et al. Antimicrobial and mechanical effects of zeolite use in dental materials: a systematic review. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2021;55(1):76–89.

Pavelic K, Hadzija M. Medical applications of zeolites. In: Auerbach SM, Carrado KA, Dutta PK, editors. Handbook of Zeolite Science and Technology. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003. p. 1143–74.

Korkmaz FM, Malkoc MA, Cobanoglu N, et al. Biocompatibility of dental restorative materials modified with zeolite: An in vitro study. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2020;18(1):2280800020914114.

Kannan K, Rengaraj S, Seung-Hyeon M. Ion exchange in zeolites and its applications: A review. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2005;79(1– 3):71–89.

Top A, Ülkü S. Silver, zinc, and copper exchange in a Na-clinoptilolite and resulting effect on antibacterial activity. Appl Clay Sci. 2004;27(1– 2):13–9.

Kawahara K, Tsuruda K, Morishita M, Uchida M. Antibacterial effect of silver-zeolite on oral bacteria under anaerobic conditions. Dent Mater. 2000;16(6):452–5.

Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27(1):76–83.

Lynch RJM. Zinc in the mouth, its interactions with dental enamel and possible effects on caries: a review. Int Dent J. 2011;61 Suppl 3:46–54.

Jones CG. Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? Periodontol 2000. 1997; 15:55–62.

Malkoc MA, Cobanoglu N, Ozdemir-Ozenen D, et al. Antibiofilm effect of zeolite-containing restorative materials on Streptococcus mutans. J Dent Sci. 2018;13(4):322–8.

Ngo H, Mount G. Atraumatic restorative treatment: a new approach to minimal intervention dentistry. Quintessence Int. 1999;30(9):621–9.

Li Z, Lee D, Sheng X, Cohen RE, Rubner MF. Two-level antibacterial coating with both release-killing and contact-killing capabilities. Langmuir. 2006;22(24):9820–3.

Braga RR, Ballester RY, Ferracane JL. Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2005;21(10):962–70.

Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, et al. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater. 2008;24(1):90–101.

Li F, Weir MD, Chen J, Xu HH. Comparison of antibacterial bonding agents by confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Dent Mater. 2014;30(9):1072–82.

Elsaka SE. Antibacterial activity and adhesive properties of a self-etch primer containing silver nanoparticles. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2012; 38:13– 7.

Cocco AR, Rosa WL, da Silva AF, Lund RG, Piva E. A systematic review about antibacterial monomers used in dental adhesive systems: current status and further prospects. Dent Mater. 2015;31(11):1345–62.

Zhang K, Melo MA, Cheng L, et al. Development of a multifunctional dental adhesive with antibacterial and remineralizing properties. Dent Mater. 2015;31(12):1322–31.

Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil JM. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endod Topics. 2005;10(1):77–102.

Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod. 2008;34(11):1291–302.

Shahi S, Rahimi S, Lotfi M, et al. A comparative study of the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement used for root- end filling. J Endod. 2006;32(4):376–9.

Zhang W, Li Z, Peng B. Assessment of a new root canal sealer’s apical sealing ability. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(6):79–82.

Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod. 2006;32(5):389–98.

Kishen A, Shi Z, Shrestha A, Neoh KG. Antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy of cationic nanoparticulates for root canal disinfection. J Endod. 2008;34(12):1515–20.

Chávez-Andrade GM, Tanomaru-Filho M, Bernardi MI, et al. Antibacterial, physical, and mechanical properties of ZnO and Ag-ZnO nanostructures in endodontic sealer. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019;107(8):1627–35.

Shahi S, Yavari HR, Rahimi S, et al. Sealing ability and antibacterial properties of new and conventional root-end filling materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(2):503–9.

Collado-González M, García-Bernal D, Onate-Sánchez RE, et al. Cytotoxicity and bioactivity of endodontic materials in human periodontal ligament stem cells. Dent Mater. 2017;33(8):1001–11.

Greenwood M, Glick M. The environmentally sustainable dental practice: a call to action. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013;144(5):467–76.

Matsumoto T, Tanaka H, Matsuda M, et al. Antibacterial activity of silver-zeolite against oral bacteria. Dent Mater J. 2003;22(4):456–62.

Park HJ, Kim JY, Kim J, Lee JH, Hahn JS, Gu MB. Silver-ion- exchanged zeolite and silver nanoparticles as antibacterial agents. J Environ Sci Health A. 2011;46(5):567–74.

FDI World Dental Federation. Sustainability in dentistry. Int Dent J. 2020;70(6):473–4.

Cocco AR, Rosa WL, Lund RG, Piva E, Silva AF. Current trends and future perspectives of antibacterial dental materials for preventive strategies. Dent Mater. 2021;37(8):1129–45.

Zhai W, Li Y, Zhang C, et al. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of nanostructured zeolite–resin composites. Dent Mater. 2014;30(9): e263– e72.

Melo MA, Cheng L, Weir MD, Hsia RC, Rodrigues LK, Xu HH. Novel dental adhesives containing nanoparticles of silver and amorphous calcium phosphate. Dent Mater. 2013;29(2):199–210.

Brauer DS. Bioactive glasses—structure and properties. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2015; 45:311–34.

Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation: Clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Int Dent J. 2010;60(1):3–10.

Cocco AR, Piva E, Lund RG, Silva AF. Antibacterial and remineralizing dental materials: future trends and translational perspectives. Dent Mater. 2021;37(12):1857–72.

Xu HH, Weir MD, Melo MA, et al. Nanocomposite strategies to improve dental restorations with antibacterial and remineralizing capabilities. Dent Mater. 2017;33(4):344–60.

Moszner N, Hirt T. New polymer-chemical developments in clinical dental polymer materials: enamel–dentin adhesives and restorative composites. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem. 2012;50(23):4369–4402.

FDI World Dental Federation. Vision 2030: Delivering Optimal Oral Health for All. Geneva: FDI; 2021.

Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil JM. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endod Topics. 2005;10(1):77–102.

Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod. 2008;34(11):1291–302.

Shahi S, Rahimi S, Lotfi M, et al. A comparative study of the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement used for root- end filling. J Endod. 2006;32(4):376–9.

Zhang W, Li Z, Peng B. Assessment of a new root canal sealer’s apical sealing ability. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(6):79–82.

Chávez-Andrade GM, Tanomaru-Filho M, Bernardi MI, et al. Antibacterial, physical, and mechanical properties of ZnO and Ag-ZnO nanostructures in endodontic sealer. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019;107(8):1627–35.

Shahi S, Yavari HR, Rahimi S, et al. Sealing ability and antibacterial properties of new and conventional root-end filling materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(2):503–9.

Collado-González M, García-Bernal D, Onate-Sánchez RE, et al. Cytotoxicity and bioactivity of endodontic materials in human periodontal ligament stem cells. Dent Mater. 2017;33(8):1001–11.

Greenwood M, Glick M. The environmentally sustainable dental practice: a call to action. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013;144(5):467–76.

FDI World Dental Federation. Sustainability in dentistry. Int Dent J. 2020;70(6):473–4.

Matsumoto T, Tanaka H, Matsuda M, et al. Antibacterial activity of silver-zeolite against oral bacteria. Dent Mater J. 2003;22(4):456–62.

Park HJ, Kim JY, Kim J, Lee JH, Hahn JS, Gu MB. Silver-ion- exchanged zeolite and silver nanoparticles as antibacterial agents. J Environ Sci Health A. 2011;46(5):567–74.

Cocco AR, Rosa WL, Lund RG, Piva E, Silva AF. Current trends and future perspectives of antibacterial dental materials for preventive strategies. Dent Mater. 2021;37(8):1129–45.

Zhai W, Li Y, Zhang C, et al. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of nanostructured zeolite–resin composites. Dent Mater. 2014;30(9): e263– 72.

Hao J, Lang S, Mante F, et al. Antimicrobial and mechanical effects of zeolite use in dental materials: a systematic review. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2021;55(1):76–89.

Korkmaz FM, Malkoc MA, Cobanoglu N, et al. Biocompatibility of dental restorative materials modified with zeolite: An in vitro study. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2020;18(1):2280800020914114.

Malkoc MA, Cobanoglu N, Ozdemir-Ozenen D, et al. Antibiofilm effect of zeolite-containing restorative materials on Streptococcus mutans. J Dent Sci. 2018;13(4):322–8.

Deshpande S, Kheur S, Kheur M, Eyüboğlu TF, Özcan M. A review on zeolites and their applications in dentistry. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2023; 10:36–42.

Zhai W, Li Y, Zhang C, et al. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of nanostructured zeolite–resin composites. Dent Mater. 2014;30(9):e263– 72.

Melo MA, Cheng L, Weir MD, Hsia RC, Rodrigues LK, Xu HH. Novel dental adhesives containing nanoparticles of silver and amorphous calcium phosphate. Dent Mater. 2013;29(2):199–210.

Brauer DS. Bioactive glasses—structure and properties. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2015; 45:311–34.

Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation: Clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Int Dent J. 2010;60(1):3–10.

Cocco AR, Piva E, Lund RG, Silva AF. Antibacterial and remineralizing dental materials: future trends and translational perspectives. Dent Mater. 2021;37(12):1857–72.