Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of recycling type III dental stone powder through crushing and rehydration on surface hardness, compressive strength, surface roughness, and setting time compared with conventional dental stone.
Materials and Methods: Eighty specimens of type III dental stone were fabricated and divided according to the performed tests into control and recycled groups. Before recycling, the previously set dental stone specimens were disinfected using 0.525% sodium hypochlorite solution, then crushed, dried at 100°C for one hour, and remixed using the same powder-to-water ratio as the conventional material. Surface hardness was measured using a Shore D hardness tester, surface roughness was assessed using a digital profilometer, and setting time was evaluated using a standardized penetration method. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.
Results: The control group showed slightly higher surface hardness values than the recycled group; however, the difference was statistically non-significant (p = 0.111). The recycled group's mean compressive strength was 23.91 ± 1.88 MPa, while the control groups was 24.85 ± 1.72 MPa. At p = 0.274, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.274). The recycled group had considerably greater surface roughness values (p = 0.004). Additionally, recycled dental stone showed a little longer setting time, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.146).
Conclusion: Recycling dental stone resulted in a slight non-significant reduction in surface hardness and compressive strength, a significant increase in surface roughness, and a slight non-significant increase in setting time. The recycled material retained satisfactory mechanical qualities in spite of these modifications, indicating its possible application as a cost-effective and sustainable substitute in dental labs.
Keywords:
Recycled dental stone, gypsum recycling, type III dental stone, surface roughness, sustainable dentistry.
References
Sakaguchi RL, Ferracane JL, Powers JM. Craig's Restorative Dental Materials. 14th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2019.
Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials. 12th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2013.
Veress S, Kerekes-Mathe B, Szekely M. Environmentally friendly behavior in dentistry. Med Pharm Rep. 2023;96(3):199-205.
Duane B, Berners-Lee M, White S. An estimated carbon footprint of NHS primary dental care within England. Br Dent J. 2017;223(8):589-593.
Tawade SU, Deshpande S, Patil P. Sustainable dentistry: recycling techniques for gypsum products in prosthodontics. Cureus. 2024;16(2):1-8.
Bilguun E. The reusing of dental stone: experimental study. Dent Health Curr Res. 2023;9(1):1-5.
Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental Materials: Properties and Manipulation. 11th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2017.
Hameed NY, Al-Dohan HM. Effect of chemical additives on the surface hardness of dental stone materials. J Baghdad Coll Dent. 2019;31(1):35-41.
Czajkowska M, et al. Comparison of dental stone models and their 3D printed acrylic replicas for accuracy and mechanical properties. Materials. 2020;13(18):4066-4075.
Fukuzaki S. Mechanisms of actions of sodium hypochlorite in cleaning and disinfection processes. Biocontrol Sci. 2006;11(4):147-157.
Moslehifard E, Lotfipour F, Robati Anaraki M, Shafee E, Ghaffari T. Efficacy of disinfection of dental stone casts: Virkon versus sodium hypochlorite. J Dent. 2015;12(3):206-215.
Ivanovski S, Savage NW, Brockhurst PJ, Bird PS. Disinfection of dental stone casts: antimicrobial effects and physical property alterations. Dent Mater. 1995;11(1):19-23.
Nassar U, Chowdhury N, Al-Shaikh A. Effect of disinfection procedures on surface roughness of dental gypsum casts. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci. 2022;7(2):55-63.
Abdulateef MA, Alfahdawi IH, Yaseen AA. Effect of dental stone fluidity properties, compatibility with impression materials, and detail reproduction after incorporation of 0.2% chlorhexidine solution. Ain Shams Dent J. 2024;34(2):49-56.
Mohammed MR, et al. The effect of sodium bicarbonate as a disinfectant solution for dental stone casts. Ain Shams Dent J. 2025;38(2):541-548.
Youssef HG, et al. Maxillary complete denture processing: evaluation of different laboratory procedures using dental stone casts. Ain Shams Dent J. 2022.
Abdelaziz KM, Combe EC, Hodges JS. The effect of disinfectants on the properties of dental gypsum, part 2: surface properties. J Prosthodont. 2002;11(4):234-240.
Al Kawas S, Khalaf M, Retief DH. The effect of selected disinfectants on the dimensional accuracy of dental stone casts. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2002;3(4):81-90.
Hameed NY. Evaluation of the yttrium oxide effect on some mechanical properties of type III dental stone. J Tech. 2023;5(2):22-28.
Overcash M. A comparison of reusable and disposable perioperative textiles: sustainability state-of-the-art. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(5):1055-1066.
Harte JA, Charlton DG. Characteristics of infection control programs in U.S. Air Force dental clinics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(7):885-892.
Al-Makramani A. Infection control in dental clinics: prosthodontic perspectives. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022;23(9):955-957.
Patil S, Kazi MM, Shidhore A, More P, Mohite M. Compliance of sterilization and disinfection protocols in dental practice: a review to reconsider basics. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2020;4(3):38050-38054.
Royal College of Physicians. Less Waste, More Health: A Health Professional's Guide to Reducing Waste. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2018.
Duane B, et al. Environmental sustainability and procurement: practices and barriers in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2019;226(6):453-458.
